Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Doran (actor)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep
- The consensus is clearly to keep the article, although from the comments it is obviously in need of expansion, probably by doing off-line research. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:15, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Johnny Doran (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable child actor, one mention in the NYT's doesn't really indicate a significant contribution to the genre. MBisanz talk 14:34, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Probably notable, based on second billing in The Pinballs, third billing in From the Mixed-Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler (I added a reference for that film), fifth billing in Treasure of Matecumbe and extensive list of other credits. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:49, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. He is mentioned in 'The Moving Picture Boy, An International Encyclopaedia from 1895 to 1995'. [1] Cst17 (talk) 10:48, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep And expand the stub. Was notable for his work in film and on stage spanning a decade, child or no... and notability is not temporary. Time to start diging through pre-internet news archives, rather than toss an article because of the difficulty. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 06:11, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep borderline notable, could use some expansion.--MrRadioGuy P T C E 02:37, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.